A recent study of a range of creative domains found that different domains correlated with different forms of intelligence and thinking (K Lunke 2016).
Distinctions have also been made between different levels of creativity. James C. Kaufman and Ronald Beghetto argue that we can display creativity in many different ways, from the creativity inherent in the learning process (“mini-c”), to everyday forms of creativity (“little-c”) to professional-level expertise in any creative endeavor (“Pro-c”), to eminent creativity (“Big-C”).
A ‘silo’ approach to creativity, suggesting that individuals can be creative in some ways, but not others, may be based on ‘cultural norms’. Such an approach to creativity may present barriers to further development including the development of creative machine intelligence.
Here, I will explore whether different forms of creativity can align with each other.